What is SB 79
SB 79 is a new California law passed in late 2025 designed to increase housing supply specifically near public transit.
The state believes that building more homes near rail lines and major bus routes is essential for lowering housing costs, reducing traffic, and supporting long-term climate goals.
In essence:
If a property sits within ½ mile of a qualifying transit stop, SB 79 allows more height, more units, and more development flexibility even if local zoning would normally block it.
This is the state’s most aggressive move yet to force cities to legalize housing where transportation already exists (or is planned).
Who Enacted It
SB 79 was authored by Senator Scott Weiner and signed in by Governor Gavin Newsom, with heavy support from California’s pro-housing policymakers and transit advocates.
The state’s view is local zoning rules haven’t produced enough housing, and cities near transit corridors must accommodate more density whether they like it or not.
Where SB 79 Applies
SB 79 applies only to properties located:
-
Within ½ mile of a high-capacity transit stop, such as:
-
Rail stations (BART, Caltrain, LA Metro Rail, San Diego Trolley, Coaster, Sprinter, etc)
-
Bus Rapid Transit stops with frequent all-day service
-
-
In cities that meet population and transit-service threshold.
If a parcel meets the proximity rules, the state’s zoning overrides the city’s current limits.
This is critical: local objections, height caps, and density limits no longer stop development in these designated areas.
4. How SB 79 Will Impact California’s Major Cities
SB 79 will affect each city differently. Transit infrastructure varies widely across the state, which will shape where development happens first, where it pencils, and where challenges emerge.
Bay Area
The Bay Area is best positioned to absorb SB 79 because it already has strong rail coverage (BART + Caltrain) and dense employment corridors.
Stations often sit near underutilized commercial or industrial land—prime for redevelopment.
We can expect to see:
-
Increased mid-rise housing opportunities near stations
-
Fewer infrastructure constraints compared to other markets
Los Angeles
LA has a large and expanding rail system, but suffers from:
-
Inconsistent transportation performance
-
Lower transit ridership post-2020
Expect the most total development activity, but also the most neighborhood resistance, political pushback, and entitlement friction.
Orange County
OC lacks a dense rail network.
Transit quality is inconsistent, and most areas remain car-dependent.
Don't expect major development here.
San Diego
San Diego wants to be a transit-oriented city shown through programs like Complete Communities but the actual transit infrastructure is limited compared to LA or the Bay Area.
Key realities:
-
The San Diego Trolley is useful, but does not cover enough high-density job centers.
-
Many “transit-rich” areas designated by the state do not function as transit-rich in practice.
-
Parking is already a major issue in central San Diego (North Park, Hillcrest, Downtown, University Heights).
SB 79 is effectively telling cities: “We don't care about the parking issues, build more housing.” -
Local objections about congestion or insufficient rail access won’t stop projects because the state has preempted local control.
Expect major pressure points around parking, congestion, and neighborhood compatibility.
Investors should anticipate unbalanced growth: upzoning outpacing transit improvements. It'll be interesting to see how the city evolves to accommodate for the continued influx of population.
The Pros & Cons for California
Pros
-
Higher density allowed automatically in major metro areas, directly helping alleviate the housing crisis.
-
Faster entitlement paths, especially when combined with SB 35 or Density Bonus programs
-
Ability to pursue larger, more profitable unit
-
Strong long-term positioning as California continues pushing TOD (Transit-Oriented Development)
Cons
-
Transit infrastructure in some cities (especially San Diego) will experience ongoing pressure from population/supply growth.
-
Local pushback and neighborhood politics may create friction
-
Limited parking allowances may hurt leasing appeal in car-dependent submarkets
-
Construction feasibility may hinge on affordability or labor components tied to height thresholds
-
Transit upgrades will take years—developers may build in advance of infrastructure
When Will We See the Effects?
2026
-
State releases official TOD (Transit-Oriented Development) maps
-
Cities required to update zoning to reflect SB 79
-
Investor awareness begins; early entitlement filings submitted
2027
-
SB 79 becomes fully enforceable
-
First wave of projects begin processing under state standards
-
Legal disputes and city “alternative TOD plans” start to appear
2028–2030
-
Broad market adoption
-
Noticeable clustering of mid-rise development near major rail nodes
-
Transit ridership impact becomes measurable
-
Cities with weak transit (SD/OC) face capacity and parking strain
-
Bay Area + LA see the strongest pipeline growth
Closing Thoughts
SB 79 marks a major shift in how California will grow.
The state is choosing transit over cars, density over sprawl, and uniform rules over local control.
For investors:
This is a chance to get ahead of where California will experience growth.
For developers:
Sites that were previously capped or constrained may suddenly support much larger, more profitable projects.
For owners:
Properties near transit areas will most likely see appreciation tied to new development potential.
Sources:
Meyers Nave – SB 79 High-Density Transit-Oriented Housing Overview
Holland & Knight – Newsom Signs SB 79
CalMatters – Housing Law & Transit Systems
